Authentication history · 60 days observed
bloomberg.com
Observed from 4 Aug 2026 to 3 Oct 2026. Nothing published in DNS has moved in that window.
Where it stands today
Live lookup, 3 Oct 2026. The same check /check/bloomberg.com runs.
- 2fine
- 2context
Looks fine
present, ending -all
Hard fail. The strictest setting and the right one once you are confident every sender is listed.
v=spf1 ip4:69.184.0.0/13 ip4:199.172.169.0/24 ip4:208.22.56.0/24 ip4:69.191.241.124 -all
Looks fine
present with p=reject
A policy that actually instructs receivers, which is more than most senders publish.
v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; ruf=mailto:dmarc-ruf@dmarc-bloomberg.com; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@dmarc-bloomberg.com
From DMARC p=none is monitoring, not enforcementSee what this looks like →
Context
No key found on the selectors we know
This is inconclusive, not a failure. selectors cannot be listed from , so we probed the common ones for Klaviyo, Google, Microsoft, Mailchimp, SendGrid and Postmark. A custom selector will not show up here.
From DKIM passing is not DKIM alignedSee what this looks like →
Context
MX records present
Where you receive mail says nothing about where you send it. Marketing sends usually leave through a different platform entirely.
mgcny2.bloomberg.com, mgcnj1.bloomberg.com, mgcnj2.bloomberg.com
What has moved
One entry per day a published record actually changed. Days we looked and found nothing different are counted, not listed.
First observation — what was already published
SPF published.
v=spf1 ip4:69.184.0.0/13 ip4:199.172.169.0/24 ip4:208.22.56.0/24 ip4:69.191.241.124 -all
DMARC published.
v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=r; aspf=r; ruf=mailto:dmarc-ruf@dmarc-bloomberg.com; fo=1; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@dmarc-bloomberg.com
No DKIM key on the selectors we probe.
MX records present.
mgcnj1.bloomberg.com, mgcnj2.bloomberg.com, mgcny1.bloomberg.com, mgcny2.bloomberg.com