Skip to content
emailrules.today

Authentication history · 59 days observed

airbnb.com

Observed from 4 Aug 2026 to 3 Oct 2026. 1 dated move on record, newest first.

Where it stands today

Live lookup, 3 Oct 2026. The same check /check/airbnb.com runs.

  • 3fine
  • 2context
  • Looks fine

    present, ending -all

    Hard fail. The strictest setting and the right one once you are confident every sender is listed.

    v=spf1 include:spf1.airbnb.com ip6:2c0f:fb50:4864::/56 ip6:2a00:1450:4864::/56 ip6:2800:3f0:4864::/56 ip6:2607:f8b0:4864::/56 ip6:2404:6800:4864::/56 ip6:2001:4860:4864::/56 ip4:98.77.0.0/16 ip4:87.253.232.0/21 ip4:76.223.176.0/20 ip4:76.223.128.0/19 -all

    See what this looks like →

  • Looks fine

    present with p=reject

    A policy that actually instructs receivers, which is more than most senders publish.

    v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;pct=100;ruf=mailto:dmarc.forensic@airbnb.com;rua=mailto:dmarc.aggregate@airbnb.com;aspf=r;adkim=r;fo=1;ri=3600

    From DMARC p=none is monitoring, not enforcementSee what this looks like →

  • Looks fine

    keys published on 2 selectors

    A key existing is not the same as working. Read a real received header and check the d= value matches your before you call this done.

    google._domainkey (Google Workspace), k1._domainkey (Mailchimp)

    From DKIM passing is not DKIM alignedSee what this looks like →

    Part platform, part you

    The key is your platform's to publish and it has. Whether it signs the domain in your is yours to confirm, and cannot show it — send one campaign to yourself and look for =pass header.d=airbnb.com in the Authentication-Results header.

  • Context

    record published

    Your logo can appear in supporting clients, which needs at quarantine or reject.

    See what this looks like →

  • Context

    Receiving mail via Google Workspace

    Where you receive mail says nothing about where you send it. Marketing sends usually leave through a different platform entirely.

    alt4.aspmx.l.google.com, alt1.aspmx.l.google.com, alt2.aspmx.l.google.com

    See what this looks like →

What has moved

One entry per day a published record actually changed. Days we looked and found nothing different are counted, not listed.

  1. SPF record changed.

    was: v=spf1 include:spf1.airbnb.com ip6:2c0f:fb50:4864::/56 ip6:2a00:1450:4864::/56 ip6:2800:3f0:4864::/56 ip6:2607:f8b0:4864::/56 ip6:2404:6800:4864::/56 ip6:2001:4860:4864::/56 ip4:87.253.232.0/21 ip4:76.223.176.0/20 ip4:76.223.128.0/19 -all
    now: v=spf1 include:spf1.airbnb.com ip6:2c0f:fb50:4864::/56 ip6:2a00:1450:4864::/56 ip6:2800:3f0:4864::/56 ip6:2607:f8b0:4864::/56 ip6:2404:6800:4864::/56 ip6:2001:4860:4864::/56 ip4:98.77.0.0/16 ip4:87.253.232.0/21 ip4:76.223.176.0/20 ip4:76.223.128.0/19 -all

    From Gmail enforces authentication, PTR, TLS and a 0.30 percent spam rate

  2. First observation — what was already published

    SPF published.

    v=spf1 include:spf1.airbnb.com ip6:2c0f:fb50:4864::/56 ip6:2a00:1450:4864::/56 ip6:2800:3f0:4864::/56 ip6:2607:f8b0:4864::/56 ip6:2404:6800:4864::/56 ip6:2001:4860:4864::/56 ip4:87.253.232.0/21 ip4:76.223.176.0/20 ip4:76.223.128.0/19 -all

    DMARC published.

    v=DMARC1;p=reject;sp=reject;pct=100;ruf=mailto:dmarc.forensic@airbnb.com;rua=mailto:dmarc.aggregate@airbnb.com;aspf=r;adkim=r;fo=1;ri=3600

    DKIM keys on selectors we probe.

    google._domainkey (Google Workspace), k1._domainkey (Mailchimp)

    BIMI published.

    v=BIMI1;l=https://vmc.digicert.com/943602a6-7765-4202-89eb-fa89bead4880.svg;

    MX records present.

    alt1.aspmx.l.google.com, alt2.aspmx.l.google.com, alt3.aspmx.l.google.com, alt4.aspmx.l.google.com, aspmx.l.google.com
Where this comes from. Public DNS, and nothing else. We read the same TXT and MX records any mail server reads before accepting a message, on the days someone looked. There is no scan, no login, no mail, and no score here — only what was published and the date we saw it. Gaps are days we did not get a clean answer from a resolver, and we would rather leave those blank than guess at them.