Nothing here needs you.
19 DNS lookups22 blocklists askedno entriesno score, ever
read from DNS, quoted verbatim
- SPF
- -all
- DMARC
- p=quarantine
- DKIM
- inconclusive
- BIMI
- published
- MX
- receiving
- LISTS
- 22 asked
Who sends as you
3 Oct 2026 · no score, no grade, nothing inferred
Who this domain authorises
Your SPF authorises Amazon SES
- include:amazonses.comread from your SPF, verbatim
This is what your DNS authorises, not proof of what you send. A domain can authorise a platform it stopped paying for two years ago, which is why an include on its own is reported as permission rather than as use. Only a real message names the address that actually sent your campaign.
Whose job each one is
- 2fine
- 3context
Looks fine
present, ending -all
Hard fail. The strictest setting and the right one once you are confident every sender is listed.
v=spf1 include:spf1.amazon.com include:spf2.amazon.com include:amazonses.com -all
Looks fine
present with p=quarantine
A policy that actually instructs receivers, which is more than most senders publish.
v=DMARC1;p=quarantine;pct=100;rua=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com;ruf=mailto:report@dmarc.amazon.com
From DMARC p=none is monitoring, not enforcementSee what this looks like →
Context
No key found on the selectors we know
This is inconclusive, not a failure. selectors cannot be listed from , so we probed the common ones for Klaviyo, Google, Microsoft, Mailchimp, SendGrid and Postmark. A custom selector will not show up here.
From DKIM passing is not DKIM alignedSee what this looks like →
Context
record published
Your logo can appear in supporting clients, which needs at quarantine or reject.
Context
MX records present
Where you receive mail says nothing about where you send it. Marketing sends usually leave through a different platform entirely.
amazon-smtp.amazon.com
Blocklists
Nothing has an entry for you.
22 lists asked0 with an entry2 could not be asked
amazon.com is not on any of the 22 lists that answered us today. That is the whole result — there is no score, and a clean answer is allowed to be short.
Which lists, and which would not answer
- SpamCopanswered
- PSBLanswered
- Mailspikeanswered
- Spam Eating Monkeyanswered
- blocklist.deanswered
- 0SPAManswered
- InterServeranswered
- SPFBLdid not confirm the entry it is required to publish
- GBUdb Truncateanswered
- s5h.netanswered
- ZapBLanswered
- SWINOGanswered
- Kemptanswered
- Anonmailsanswered
- Fabelanswered
- NoSolicitadoanswered
- Schulteanswered
- JIPPGanswered
- UCEPROTECT Level 1answered
- UCEPROTECT Level 2answered
- UCEPROTECT Level 3answered
- Backscattereranswered
- SEM Backscatteranswered
- URIBLdeclined the query
Each of these answered an entry it is required to publish, and one it is required not to, before we believed anything it said about you. A list that fails either is reported as unanswered rather than as clean — because a blocklist that declines to reply looks exactly like one giving you the all-clear. How we choose them.
We have observed this domain on 56 days. See what has moved since.
Putting this in a client report? Embed a live, dated badge that re-checks itself.
Watch this domain
One email if authentication DNS for amazon.com actually changes. Same list as rule alerts — one inbox, one promise.